Comments for A Sycophant of the Bourgeoisie http://sycophant.wordpress.com Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:56:01 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Why I Hate Dogs by Jo N http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/why-i-hate-dogs/#comment-3232 Jo N Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:56:01 +0000 http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/why-i-hate-dogs/#comment-3232 agree 100%. Can't stand dogs and the stupidity of dog owners. They are simply dirty, noisy, annoying, stupid creatures. They bark endlessly, shed, climb on the furniture jump on guests, chase skateboarders/cyclists. They can't help bring in the groceries, wash dishes, clean, cook, sweep, mop......they require energy output that could be used on somthing important, they cost money (food, vet etc.) basically they serve no purpose. agree 100%. Can’t stand dogs and the stupidity of dog owners. They are simply dirty, noisy, annoying, stupid creatures. They bark endlessly, shed, climb on the furniture jump on guests, chase skateboarders/cyclists.
They can’t help bring in the groceries, wash dishes, clean, cook, sweep, mop……they require energy output that could be used on somthing important, they cost money (food, vet etc.) basically they serve no purpose.

]]> Comment on The Unfair Subway by himanshu http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/the-unfair-subway/#comment-3194 himanshu Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:11:00 +0000 https://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/the-unfair-subway/#comment-3194 please mail me the solution if u can! please mail me the solution if u can!

]]> Comment on 10 Good Books by Don Boudreaux http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/10-good-books/#comment-2513 Don Boudreaux Fri, 04 May 2007 21:44:23 +0000 http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/10-good-books/#comment-2513 Thanks! Don Thanks!

Don

]]> Comment on Too Many Laws by Pat Fullerton http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/too-many-laws/#comment-2261 Pat Fullerton Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:39:50 +0000 http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/too-many-laws/#comment-2261 Hi Sandy just a few points on your comments. Laws express the State’s pessimism and desire to take control of its citizen’s movements, and more so today, as an economic machine? And, as the true sound of Liberty is the silence of the laws, citizens must judge for themselves how free they feel. The idea of legal responsibilities is based around Rights and Obligations in our social exchanges. So, is the balance still in play or are there now changes in the relationship between the State and the People. That’s for all individuals to judge. The economic argument is a misnomer with regard to recourses. All activity is one a valued judgement, if the act of legal offence is valued by the victim or the State, then the system of law is well paid for its involvement. The majority of the costs of law activity fall to the individuals involved in the majority of cases. As the role and focus of the President’s office is to express his rights to make law under the Constitution, his power, is the power his office demands. Whilst he has strong powers he will generally base his legislative activity on his planned interest towards his governing ideals, which seems quite rational to me. The President’s focus and power is constitutionally based around Foreign Policy and the Military as well as Public Order. His legislative powers support him in his tenure, as well as giving him currency for negotiations with Congress. Local and regional laws are rarely influenced be Presidents to my understanding. The definition of Politics is, “to have power ‘to’ and ‘over’ something, therefore all act of the judiciary are political. Hi Sandy just a few points on your comments. Laws express the State’s pessimism and desire to take control of its citizen’s movements, and more so today, as an economic machine? And, as the true sound of Liberty is the silence of the laws, citizens must judge for themselves how free they feel.

The idea of legal responsibilities is based around Rights and Obligations in our social exchanges. So, is the balance still in play or are there now changes in the relationship between the State and the People. That’s for all individuals to judge.

The economic argument is a misnomer with regard to recourses. All activity is one a valued judgement, if the act of legal offence is valued by the victim or the State, then the system of law is well paid for its involvement. The majority of the costs of law activity fall to the individuals involved in the majority of cases.

As the role and focus of the President’s office is to express his rights to make law under the Constitution, his power, is the power his office demands. Whilst he has strong powers he will generally base his legislative activity on his planned interest towards his governing ideals, which seems quite rational to me. The President’s focus and power is constitutionally based around Foreign Policy and the Military as well as Public Order. His legislative powers support him in his tenure, as well as giving him currency for negotiations with Congress. Local and regional laws are rarely influenced be Presidents to my understanding.

The definition of Politics is, “to have power ‘to’ and ‘over’ something, therefore all act of the judiciary are political.

]]> Comment on W.V.O. Quine by Shay http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/10/22/wvo-quine/#comment-1027 Shay Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:26:51 +0000 http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/10/22/wvo-quine/#comment-1027 I like Quine too. I constantly refer to his "Two Dogmas of Empiricism". I like Quine too. I constantly refer to his “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”.

]]> Comment on Google or Wikipedia? by dwaisberg http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/google-or-wikipedia/#comment-974 dwaisberg Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:57:00 +0000 http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/google-or-wikipedia/#comment-974 Is it a question??? I think the best way to decide "what could that potentially mean for Google" is to ask the market. A quote from Reuters, Oct 23, http://tinyurl.com/y9e4zz Google's market capitalization now exceeds $146 billion, higher than more established technology leaders, including IBM (IBM.N: Quote, Profile, Research), Intel Corp. (INTC.O: Quote, Profile, Research) or Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ.N: Quote, Profile, Research). The Mountain View, California company ranks 14th in overall U.S. market terms, just behind Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO.O: Quote, Profile, Research), at $148 billion, but far behind No. 1-ranked Exxon Mobil, with a $416 billion capitalization. "Really the only major Internet stock now that a lot of people want to own is Google," said Standard & Poor's equity analyst Scott Kessler. Is it a question??? I think the best way to decide “what could that potentially mean for Google” is to ask the market. A quote from Reuters, Oct 23, http://tinyurl.com/y9e4zz

Google’s market capitalization now exceeds $146 billion, higher than more established technology leaders, including IBM (IBM.N: Quote, Profile, Research), Intel Corp. (INTC.O: Quote, Profile, Research) or Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ.N: Quote, Profile, Research).

The Mountain View, California company ranks 14th in overall U.S. market terms, just behind Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO.O: Quote, Profile, Research), at $148 billion, but far behind No. 1-ranked Exxon Mobil, with a $416 billion capitalization.

“Really the only major Internet stock now that a lot of people want to own is Google,” said Standard & Poor’s equity analyst Scott Kessler.

]]> Comment on Google or Wikipedia? by Hatul http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/google-or-wikipedia/#comment-951 Hatul Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:20:45 +0000 http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/google-or-wikipedia/#comment-951 Welcome back!!! Why you no post nothing for so so long? Welcome back!!! Why you no post nothing for so so long?

]]> Comment on Hail Capitalism by Defending Capital » bloodykitty.com http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/08/13/hail-capitalism/#comment-658 Defending Capital » bloodykitty.com Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:55:38 +0000 https://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/08/13/hail-capitalism/#comment-658 [...] Apparently Capitalism is good because it leads to things like Bill and Melinda Gates having a race with Warren Buffett on who can spend the most money on charity: Hail Capitalism « a sycophant of the bourgeoisie [...] [...] Apparently Capitalism is good because it leads to things like Bill and Melinda Gates having a race with Warren Buffett on who can spend the most money on charity: Hail Capitalism « a sycophant of the bourgeoisie [...]

]]> Comment on art by ilan waisberg by Lól http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/02/24/art-by-ilan-waisberg/#comment-270 Lól Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:49:05 +0000 http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/02/24/art-by-ilan-waisberg/#comment-270 where did you find this? where did you find this?

]]> Comment on advice to young authors by Shay http://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/04/24/advice-to-young-authors/#comment-16 Shay Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:43:32 +0000 https://sycophant.wordpress.com/2006/04/24/advice-to-young-authors/#comment-16 hehehe, awesome. hehehe, awesome.

]]>